Love Wins by Rob Bell

Go get this book and read it.Someone at HarperCollins just got a raise. A couple of weeks ago, they ‘leaked’ a promo for Rob Bell’s new book, Love Wins, and basically exploded the internet. The book claims to take on our ideas of Heaven and Hell, but it’s really, foundationally, about who we understand God to be. Before the book even came out, lots of guys were calling Bell a heretic (which they’d already been doing anyway) and those who defend Bell responded in kind. I’m going to stay out of the mud-slinging and just talk about the book. So here goes…

If you’ve never read a Rob Bell book, you’re doing yourself a disservice. Bell has the uncanny ability to pack a million pounds of meaning into a couple of sentences that are as easy to read and understandable as anything you’d read in a pop fiction novel. And his approach to the scriptures can only be called an art – it’s clever, subtle and original. Love Wins is no different. In this book, Bell’s fundamental question is about the nature of reality – are we living in a comedy or a tragedy?

Bell believes that the universe has a happy ending (which should not be a surprise, given the book’s title, right?)

Bell opens with two chapters on Heaven and Hell, and argues the same about both: Heaven and Hell are realities that are happening now and will extend into eternity. We can participate in Heaven now. Or we can choose to make Hell. His case here is built on good, strong exploration of Biblical texts and he raises a number of great questions.

Bell flips the question of Eternity on its head – Christianity is less about where you go when you die and more about “dragging the future into the present.”

This theme is one of Bell’s strongest and clearest: that Heaven and Hell are not places we go after we die, but essentially, primarily modes of living here and now. I was reminded strongly of another of my favorite books, C.S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce:
Imagine being a racist in heaven-on-earth, sitting down at the great feast and realizing that you’re sitting next to them. Those people. The ones you’ve despised for years… Jesus makes no promises that in the blink of an eye we will suddenly become totally different people who have vastly different tastes, attitudes, and perspectives.
From there, Bell moves into the realm of speculation. He freely, readily admits that he’s leaving the space in which the Bible speaks clearly and asks Does Hell last forever? In short, Bell hopes not. While affirming the reality of Hell and the fact that people will go there, he offers up the hope that Hell – precisely as punishment – will be corrective, that God’s endlessly persistent love will “melt even the hardest hearts.” This is the chapter of the book that caused all the waves, so I just want to point out that

Bell can say that Hell isn’t necessarily eternal and still be well within the bounds of Orthodoxy. You can disagree, but you can’t call him a heretic.


The next section of the book was the most challenging to me, and also my favorite. Bell turns to the question, Is Jesus the only way? His answer (as you might expect) is Yes, but not in the way you probably think. Bell takes a hard look at how the Scriptures describe Jesus, digging deep into the mystery of the Incarnation. According to the Scriptures, Jesus is the embodiment of the creative Word of God – the word that said Let there be light and created light. Jesus created everything that exists and works all the time to sustain everything.

Moses strikes a rock and water comes out. Paul later says the rock was Jesus, which Bell explores in a fantastic midrash in his book.So according to the Scriptures, Jesus is everywhere, working all the time. And if that’s true, then Bell suggests that Jesus might bring people to God in tons of other ways that are not necessarily through the historic, orthodox Church. Still through Jesus, but not through the Church. On second thought, this was the section that made everyone mad.
None of us have cornered the market on Jesus, and none of us ever will… Whatever categories have been created, whatever biases are hanging like a mist in the air, whatever labels and assumptions have gone unchecked and untested, he continually defies, destroys, and disregards.

At the root of all the anger over Love Wins is plain old-fashioned control issues – we want to be the final arbiter of who’s in and who’s out. But Bell says Jesus gets to save whomever Jesus wants. It’s not up to us.

Love Wins wraps up with a poetic exploration of the Prodigal Son that I won’t ruin here. Suffice to say, it’s worth the read, and you get the clear sense that Bell planned to cause such a stir precisely so he could illustrate exactly what he’s talking about – sometimes ‘goodness’ is a problem:
[The younger brother’s] sins have separated him from his father… [But the older brother’s] problem is his “goodness”. His rule-keeping and law-abiding confidence in his own works has actually served to distance him from his father… Our badness can separate us from God’s love, that’s clear. But our goodness can separate us from God’s love as well.
Bell’s book is a lot to chew on; it’ll certainly reward several close readings. But it is well within the bounds of Orthodox Christianity, and asks some very good questions (it’s far outside the bounds of Orthodox New Calvinism, and some people mistake that for the whole of the Christian tradition, but rest assured they’re deluded). We need to be talking about Heaven, Hell and the picture of God that lies behind them. It’s a fun read and very accessible.

Bottom Line: Bell took a bunch of abstract theological questions and dragged them out in the light so we can all talk about them. So get going! And remember to have fun and play nice.

email
  • http://pomoxian.com Henry Imler

    Meredith and I's thoughts exactly. She's listened to the audiobook and I am 70% way through the ebook.

  • http://Jakemalloy.com Jake

    Almost sad that we are so predictable that he could orchestrate such a life example for his book. Adds strength to the argument that God can win over anyone; surely He is at least as crafty as Bell.

  • http://Highcalloffatherhood.com Jason

    "But Bell says Jesus gets to save whomever Jesus wants. It’s not up to us."

    That sounds a little Calvinist. I'd have to say if this is his stance I'll have a hard time disagreeing.

    Haven't read the book yet but I bet I do soon.

    You handled a touchy topic very well. Good work.

  • http://www.thepiecesofreeses.com Jeff R

    Excellent review. It will be my next commute audiobook. It would be nice if a lesson learned from all of this is that healthy disagreements lead to great discussions, but completely disregarding the other side achieves nothing.

  • http://www.callingallpeacemakers.blogspot.com mattF

    dude, your take on "are we living in a comedy or tragedy" has my mind running in circles. is the ending a wedding or a pile of bodies? good stuff man. i'd love to have some more dialogue with you. i hope you're well bro. peace

  • Kelly MLV

    Thanks for the review. All the critics that were criticizing Rob Bell and the book were really getting under my skin. I never imagined it possible to call someone a heretic using a book as proof before even reading the words.

    I look forward to reading it.

  • http://facebook.com/clintonsharp Clinton

    I am reading it right now. I have always loved reading and listening to Rob Bell. It is such a shame that many hyper-Calvinists are labeling him a heretic. I am still wrestling with his thoughts on God restoring all things. I think he brings up some good points that people need to be talking about.

    I really enjoyed reading Rich Mouw's take on the book. He made a statement about the controversy that was awesome--"Why don’t folks who criticize Rob Bell for wanting to let too many people in also go after people like that who want to keep too many people out? Why are we rougher on salvific generosity than on salvific stinginess?"

  • Nathan Collier

    I finished it Saturday. My mind is pretty much blown. I even asked my Dad to read it since he's been at this way longer than me.

    A friend of mine said, "I want it to be true."

    Me too.

    But man, it's still just so different than anything else I've read or heard. And I've read and heard a lot. I feel like I need to reread the whole Bible now.

  • http://pomoxian.com Henry Imler

    No matter what you think of the conclusions (heaven and hell are also here now) and the hopeful suggestions (that God extends the offer to accept him after death), there is no denying that this is a deeply biblical book rooted in a love for God and people. I can't help to recommend it.

  • http://pomoxian.com Henry Imler

    Nathan,

    Have you read much Wright? How does what Bell say fit in with Wright in your estimation?

  • Ron Krumpos

    In his new book "Love Wins" Rob Bell says he believes that loving and compassionate people, regardless of their faith, will not be condemned to an eternal hell just because they do not accept Jesus Christ as their Savior.

    Concepts of an afterlife vary between religions and among divisions of each faith. Here are three quotes from "the greatest achievement in life," my ebook on comparative mysticism:

    (46) Few people have been so good that they have earned eternal paradise; fewer want to go to a place where they must receive punishments for their sins. Those who do believe in resurrection of their body hope that it will be not be in its final form. Few people really want to continue to be born again and live more human lives; fewer want to be reborn in a non-human form. If you are not quite certain you want to seek divine union, consider the alternatives.

    (59) Mysticism is the great quest for the ultimate ground of existence, the absolute nature of being itself. True mystics transcend apparent manifestations of the theatrical production called “this life.” Theirs is not simply a search for meaning, but discovery of what is, i.e. the Real underlying the seeming realities. Their objective is not heaven, gardens, paradise, or other celestial places. It is not being where the divine lives, but to be what the divine essence is here and now.

    (80) [referring to many non-mystics] Depending on their religious convictions, or personal beliefs, they may be born again to seek elusive perfection, go to a purgatory to work out their sins or, perhaps, pass on into oblivion. Lives are different; why not afterlives? Beliefs might become true.

    Rob Bell asks us to rethink the Christian Gospel. People of of all faiths should look beyond the letters of their sacred scriptures to their spiritual message. As one of my mentors wrote "In God we all meet."

  • Becky Brown

    I am listening to Rob Bell reading Love Wins. Challenging and thought provoking. Discussion is good, even better if we begin to practice what Jesus preaches, Love wins.

  • Nathan Collier

    Henry,

    I haven't read any Write or Brueggeman, which J.R. mentioned on Facebook. I think that's part of my problem. I've only really read one side of the tradition, so to me this was completely out of left field.

    My wife (then girlfriend) introduced me to Bell and Don Miller a couple of years ago. Reading and listening to those two the past couple of years has introduced me to a whole conversation I hadn't been aware of before. And I love that. I have much to learn.

  • http://www.theskepticalmagician.com The Skeptical Magician

    I personally don't think that Rob Bell goes far enough. Rather than take up a mile of comment space here, you can see my thoughts on the issue here: http://theskepticalmagician.wordpress.com/2011/03/16/a-horrific-tale-rob-bell-love-wins/

  • http://www.jrforasteros.com JR. Forasteros

    I don't really have anything to add to all your comments - they are spectacular.

    Those of you who were in the middle of the book - have you finished it yet? If so, do you have any new thoughts or insights?

  • Pingback: Book Review: #29 – Love Wins by Rob Bell « Let's eat, Grandpa! Let's eat Grandpa! (Punctuation saves lives.)

  • Pingback: Book Review: Love Wins

  • Anrew

    Wow I had some respect for you after your review of Mark Driscoll's book but this is ridiculous.  

    "
    well within the bounds of Orthodox Christianity "
    "Asks some good questions"

    He butchers the story of Lazarus and performs some of the most ridiculous exegetical acrobatics I've ever seen.  He improperly uses several Greek words.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg.  You realize this guy is at odds with 2k years of christianity, right?

    It's not primarily about control--it's about the words of Jesus.  Why would Jesus have all these stories ... wheat & tares, dragnet, parable of the sower, sheep & wolves .... why would Jesus make all these distinctions if "but REALLY guys, don't worry about it, I'll give you all another chance anyway"?

      

  • http://www.jrforasteros.com JR. Forasteros

    Hi Anrew...

    First, could I ask what the purpose of your comment here is?

    If it's to engage in helpful discussion, please reign in your tone. You come across as very combative.

    If it was just to let me know that you don't respect me, mission accomplished. I don't see any further reason to comment.